Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ

Board index » General CFL Talk




 Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 



Author Message
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 2:58 pm 
Offline
You're Secretly Designing The New Stadium
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 8704
Location: Section F
I always feel that penalties are under-reported in the CFL and so I thought I should do my part to help fill the void. I've written up a blog on the penalties after week three and have put some penalties on our stats page.

Check it out here:

http://www.cflhorsemen.ca/blogs.html

_________________
2012 CFLHorsemen Radio Predictions Champion!

Image
http://www.bigchiefmeatsnacks.com


Top 
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline
Randy Chevrier Thinks You've Got Some Talent

Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:53 am
Posts: 923
Location: Medicine Hat
Wow, this is awesome stuff for numbers nerds such as myself.

Thanks for doing this Childress!!


Top 
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:37 am 
Offline
Charleston Hughes Can't Do A Swim Move On You
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 1851
It's summertime Childress. Go have some fun Dude!

This is some good work though.

_________________
“Life is something that everyone should try at least once.” ― Henry J. Tillman


Top 
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:22 am 
Offline
Dave Dickenson Asks You For Your input on the Offense
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 2900
Location: Section R
DIGGING DEEPER INTO LAST WEEK'S CFL PENALTIES

Quote:
Last week in the CFL the penalty flags were flying. In total between the four games played there were 110 penalties for 958 yards, which is the third-highest total in the last 20 years. Obviously, that is way too many penalties. It disrupts the flow of the game, extends the length of the game, and is flat out hard to watch.

However, it is one thing to simply complain about the flag-filled week. It's another to examine the calls, look at the reasons why they were made, and work towards finding solutions so it doesn't happen again. In conjunction with the league's head coaches, that is exactly what Glen Johnson, the league's Vice-President of Officiating, is currently working on. It is a process that will take some time for a couple reasons, the most important being that we are all learning a new culture in football where player safety is the focus. However, all the league stake holders are all in to work towards limiting the amount of penalties called, and the time it takes to call them.

Johnson has accumulated the numbers from last week and some from the first three weeks of the season, and they may surprise football fans. First, all of the penalties from last week have been reviewed and, of the 110 called, 93 of them were the correct call while only seven of them were debatable or questionable calls. Essentially, 94 per cent of the calls made last week were correct which according to Johnson is, "very close to the overall standards from the last few years."

These numbers are significant, because it is important to understand that fixing the problem of too many penalties does not just fall on the shoulders of the officials. The players and coaches are ultimately responsible, and are working with Johnson on a weekly basis to improve the situation. Johnson explained by pointing out that there are currently teams that have asked the league to make officials available for practices. "I talk to the coaches and we are working together to improve the situation on a weekly basis, in fact some teams have asked that we supply them refs at practice, which I think is an excellent idea, and can help the teams and our officials."

After three weeks this season penalties are up by 31 per cent overall, which is a huge jump. However, when you dig a little deeper into the numbers, we shouldn't be surprised. Of the 31 per cent increase this year, "player safety fouls," are leading the way. Penalties like unnecessary roughness, roughing the passer, face masking, and sportsmanship-related fouls like taunting are driving the increase. When you consider what is happening in North America when it comes to player safety in contact sports, we shouldn't be surprised that calls that are designed to protect the players, sometimes from themselves, are up dramatically. It is going to take time for players to understand what is a legal hit, and what is not, when they have trained their whole lives to hit a certain way, especially when we are talking about the hits on the quarterbacks.


http://www.tsn.ca/cfl/story/?id=457323

_________________
2015: Year of the Repeat


Top 
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:26 am 
Offline
Dave Dickenson Asks You For Your input on the Offense
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 2900
Location: Section R
This part of Suitor's article had me do a double take.

Quote:
First, all of the penalties from last week have been reviewed and, of the 110 called, 93 of them were the correct call while only seven of them were debatable or questionable calls. Essentially, 94 per cent of the calls made last week were correct which according to Johnson is, "very close to the overall standards from the last few years."


Unless he typed 110 instead of 100 penalties he is incorrect that 94% of the calls correct and very close to overall standards. My math says 93 out of 110 is 84.5%

_________________
2015: Year of the Repeat


Top 
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:55 am 
Offline
You're Secretly Designing The New Stadium
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 8704
Location: Section F
Jesters91 wrote:
This part of Suitor's article had me do a double take.

Quote:
First, all of the penalties from last week have been reviewed and, of the 110 called, 93 of them were the correct call while only seven of them were debatable or questionable calls. Essentially, 94 per cent of the calls made last week were correct which according to Johnson is, "very close to the overall standards from the last few years."


Unless he typed 110 instead of 100 penalties he is incorrect that 94% of the calls correct and very close to overall standards. My math says 93 out of 110 is 84.5%


When I look at the Stamps games, just from memory, I see two roughing the passer calls that were a joke in the last game, and a contacting the kicker call where the blocker pushed our rusher into the kicker. That would be three bad calls off the top of my head.

Only 7 bad calls across the league and the Stamps have three? I think it must be more like 17.

That said, I expect the refs to make some bad calls every game. They are human. It is not any different than Bo Levi over-throwing some receivers or receivers dropping passes, etc.. Mistakes are part of what makes the game interesting.

_________________
2012 CFLHorsemen Radio Predictions Champion!

Image
http://www.bigchiefmeatsnacks.com


Top 
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 10:20 am 
Offline
You're Secretly Designing The New Stadium
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 8704
Location: Section F
Goal Digger wrote:
It's summertime Childress. Go have some fun Dude!

This is some good work though.


If you loved football as much as I do, you'd know that reporting on it is fun.

Just trying to add content to the CFL football community...

_________________
2012 CFLHorsemen Radio Predictions Champion!

Image
http://www.bigchiefmeatsnacks.com


Top 
 Post Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:41 pm 
Offline
You're Secretly Designing The New Stadium
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:14 pm
Posts: 16454
What's a penaty? :razz:


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 




Board index » General CFL Talk


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: